There won’t be anything new in this post, I’m sure any thoughts I have on Twitter, to which I am new, have been said before.
To begin, I’m using twhirl as my client on most of my machines. I like it because I can have the same interface across OS X, Linux, and XP. The only thing I don’t have twirl for is my iPhone and I’m using Hahlo on that.
On Twitter I’m @statrixbob btw.
Okay, what’s so interesting?
Today I was trying to explain Facebook to a friend of mine who is new to it (as am I for the most part). He mentioned that over the years (and we’ve been playing on the net since the late 80’s at least) we’ve used:
You and I have figured out how to trade files with one another
over the course of a couple of decades. We went through…
ftp
chat
split
talk/ytalk
kibitz
screen (I still use it)
etc.
etc.
We’ve also been involved in a mailing list for years, though we’ve now seemed to have migrated to Facebook for that. So what is the difference?
It seems to me that much of what we’ve used over the years has facilitated communications on a ‘one to one’ basis. You email me, I respond. Expanding that to a listserv we get to a ‘one to many’ communication. Using some of the unix tools like kibitz mentioned allow for different sorts of communcations, but they are still mostly either one to one, or one to many.
Facebook seems to change that a bit by really allowing ‘many to many’ communications. Responding to a listserv can mimic ‘many to many’ communication, but only serially. Facebook does it in a parallel fashion, many things can happen at once.
Twitter however isn’t really ‘many to many’ in the way facebook is, it seems to me to be more of a massive ‘one to many’ tool, but with a difference. All of the tools above more or less require that those in communication form a community by giving explicit permission. You can spam me once, but I’ll filter you out after that. I have to choose you as a friend in Facebook, you have to allow me to do so.
Twitter does away with that. I choose who I want to follow and do so – no permission necessary. You do the same to me (not many do) and I cannot prevent it. Thus the growth of communities, such as they are, isn’t so much designed as formed chaotically – patterns emerge, but they aren’t planned.
I’ve noticed more than a few hits in a Google search point out more or less what I’ve just pointed out, so as I said, nothing new here.
Aloha!